Supreme Ct.
"What the people want is very simple. They want an America as good as its promise."... Barbara Jordan
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." (1776)
July 04, 2009... What a turning point in history this statement was on the first Fourth of July 233 years ago. Yet this bold ideal was proclaimed long in advance of any practical chance of fulfillment. The author of these words was an owner of African slaves.
So 87 years later, another eloquent writer and speaker could appeal to these words to fight for the end of slavery in the United States:
.
Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth, upon this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal. - Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived, and so dedicated, can long endure. - It is for us, the living, rather to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they have, thus far, so nobly carried on. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us - that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they here gave the last full measure of devotion - that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain; that this nation shall have a new birth of freedom; and that this government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.
.And slavery did indeed end, yet legal equality for African-Americans did not arrive. So 100 years later, another great American would say:
I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: "We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal."
.
And thanks to the efforts of the civil rights movement he led, African-Americans achieved legal equality. http://economistsview.typepad.com/economistsview/2009/07/created-equal.html
.
***********************************************************************
U.S. Constitution: Article III Section 1. (1787) The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office.
.
The U.S. Supreme Court's Dark Side...Past And Present
Now “We” Know Why “Y'all” Can’t Get It Right
The Supreme Court, 1937. The man in the Klan robe was Justice Van Deventer, who
was soon to retire from the court. The photo appeared in the New York Sun on
October 2, 1937. http://www.kkklan.com/wall.htm
The Hughes Court, 1932–1937. Front row: Justices Brandeis and Van Devanter, Chief Justice Hughes, and Justices McReynolds and Sutherland. Back row: Justices Roberts, Butler, Stone, and Cardozo.
.
********************************************************************
.
Thomas Garrett, American abolitionist: The chief justice of the Supreme Court, Roger B. Taney, had already shown that he was a supporter of slavery. In 1848, Thomas Garrett, a Delaware Quaker, was arrested for helping Maryland slaves flee from their masters. Taney sat as the judge in the trial and fined Garrett $5,400, then an enormous sum that left Garrett almost penniless. After hearing the sentence, Garrett used the Quaker way of speaking to say to the judge: “Thou has left me without a dollar....I say to thee and to all in this court room, that if anyone knows a fugitive who wants shelter....send him to Thomas Garrett and he will befriend him.” . http://www.mrlincolnshightechwar.com/chapter_files/sit_reportA.html .
(Roger B. Taney) - Dred Scott v. Sanford: March of 1857, the United States Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, a former slave owner, declared that "beings of an inferior order, and altogether unfit to associate with the white race, either in social or political relations, and so far inferior that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect." and all blacks -- slaves as well as free -- were not and could never become citizens of the United States. The court also declared the 1820 Missouri Compromise unconstitutional, thus permitting slavery in all of the country's territories. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/aia/part4/4h2933t.html
The Dred Scott Decision - - Dred Scott was the name of an African-American slave. He was taken by his master, an officer in the U.S. Army, from the slave state of Missouri to the free state of Illinois and then to the free territory of Wisconsin. He lived on free soil for a long period of time. When the Army ordered his master to go back to Missouri, he took Scott with him back to that slave state, where his master died. In 1846, Scott was helped by Abolitionist (anti-slavery) lawyers to sue for his freedom in court, claiming he should be free since he had lived on free soil for a long time. The case went all the way to the United States Supreme Court. The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, Roger B. Taney, was a former slave owner from Maryland.
In March of 1857, Scott lost the decision as seven out of nine Justices on the Supreme Court declared no slave or descendant of a slave could be a U.S. citizen, or ever had been a U.S. citizen. As a non-citizen, the court stated, Scott had no rights and could not sue in a Federal Court and must remain a slave.
At that time there were nearly 4 million slaves in America. The court's ruling affected the status of every enslaved and free African-American in the United States. The ruling served to turn back the clock concerning the rights of African-Americans, ignoring the fact that black men in five of the original States had been full voting citizens dating back to the Declaration of Independence in 1776.
Anti-slavery leaders in the North cited the controversial Supreme Court decision as evidence that Southerners wanted to extend slavery throughout the nation and ultimately rule the nation itself. Southerners approved the Dred Scott decision believing Congress had no right to prohibit slavery in the territories. Abraham Lincoln reacted with disgust to the ruling and was spurred into political action, publicly speaking out against it.
Overall, the Dred Scott decision had the effect of widening the political and social gap between North and South and took the nation closer to the brink of Civil War. http://www.historyplace.com/lincoln/dred.htm
.
EDUCATION PROHIBITED The Slave not being regarded as a member of Society, nor as a human being, the Government, instead of providing for his education, takes care to forbid it, as being inconsistent with the condition of chattelhood. CHATTELS are not educated! And if human beings are to be held in chattelhood, education must be withheld from them. “In Georgia, by Act of 1829, no person is permitted to teach a slave, negro, or free person of color to read or write. So in Virginia, by statute, in 1830, meetings of free negroes to learn reading and writing are unlawful, and subject them to corporal punishment; and it is unlawful for white persons to assemble with free negroes or slaves, to teach them to read or write. The prohibitory Act of the Legislature of Alabama, passed in the session of 1831-2, relative to instruction to be given to the slave or free colored population, or exhortation or preaching to them, or any mischievous influence attempted to be exerted over them, is sufficiently penal. Laws of similar import are presumed to exist in the other slaveholding States; but in Louisiana, the law is armed with tenfold severity. It not only forbids any person teaching slaves to read or write, but it declares, that any person using language in any public discourse, from the bar, bench, stage, or pulpit, or in any other place, or in any private conversation, or making use of any signs or actions having a tendency to produce discontent among the free colored population, or insubordination among the slaves, or who shall be knowingly instrumental in bringing into the State any paper, book, or pamphlet, having the like tendency, shall, on conviction, be punished with imprisonment or death, at the discretion of the Court.” http://www.dinsdoc.com/goodell-1-2-6.htm
.
Department of Justice Office of Public Affairs April 13, 2010 - WASHINGTON – A federal court has ordered the Walthall County, Miss., School District to eliminate policies that have resulted in significant racial segregation among students in the school district, the Justice Department today announced. http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2010/April/10-crt-400.html
.
.
Homer Plessy (1863 – 1925) . Arrested, tried and convicted of a violation of Louisiana's racial segregation laws--his great-grandmother was black--he appealed to the Supreme Court. The resulting "separate-but-equal" decision against him had wide consequences for the U.S. civil rights for the next half century. http://www.spock.com/Homer-Plessy
.In 1896 the U. S. Supreme Court upheld the lower court's ruling in Plesser v. Furguson. The Court asserted that Plessy's rights were not denied him because the separate accommodations provided to blacks were equal to those provided whites. It also ruled that "separate but equal" accommodations did not stamp the "colored race with a badge of inferiority." http://library.thinkquest.org/J0112391/plessy_v__ferguson.htm
.One-drop rule… The one-drop rule was a tactic in the U.S. South that codified and strengthened segregation and the disfranchisement of most blacks...from 1890-1910. After Supreme Court decisions in Plessy v. Ferguson and related matters, White-dominated legislatures felt free to enact Jim Crow laws segregating Blacks in public places and accommodations, and passed other restrictive legislation. Legislatures sought to prevent interracial relationships to keep the white race "pure", long after slaveholders and overseers took advantage of enslaved women and produced the many mixed-race children. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-drop_rule
.
*************************************************************************
.
American eugenics... Atlanta Ga . a powerful social movement based on the idea that society's problems could be solved if those considered "superior" were allowed to make more children while those considered "inferior" were no longer allowed to have children -- was going strong. Lawmakers from several states had already adopted laws making it mandatory to operate on people with physical, developmental and psychiatric disabilities, along with homosexuals and other "undesirables", to make sure they did not have children. Eight years earlier, The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the eugenicists in Buck vs. Bell (1927) http://karmak.org/archive/2004/06/buckvbell.html . Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes speaking for the Court, wrote, "three generations of imbeciles are enough". Some Americans were worried that Nazi Germany under Adolf Hitler was getting ahead of the U.S. in terms of purifying the "white race". Between 1937 and 1970, an estimated 3,300 Georgians were legally forced to undergo sterilization surgery. http://www.inclusiondaily.com/archives/07/02/05/020507gaeugenic.htm
On December 10, 1967, prior to Virginia High giving birth to our son George W. High, Jr. at St Joseph Hospital in Atlanta, and because she was black, she became one of the 3,300 Georgians who were legally forced to undergo sterilization surgery, as she fell under the category of "undesirables"...thanks to the U.S. Supreme ct., Justice Holmes, Adolf Hitler, The State of Georgia, American Eugenics and the kkk...
.
Genocide by the provisions of the convention of the United Nations in Dec. 1948 is defined as: "any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial, or religious group, and includes five types of criminal actions: killing members of the group; causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; and forcibly transferring children of the group to another group."
.*******************************************************************
.
Photograph of the 3 Duluth lynching victims http://shop.mnhs.org/pages.cfm?ID=36
On June 15, 1920, police arrest several young black men accused of raping a white woman. That evening, three of them – Elias Clayton, Elmer Jackson, and Isaac McGhie – are taken from jail by a mob and lynched. The Circus Comes to Town…It was the John Robinson Circus that brought Elias Clayton, Elmer Jackson, and Isaac McGhie to Duluth. They and other young black men were employed by the circus as cooks and “roustabouts,” laborers who performed a variety of physical tasks. Traveling by train, the circus was greeted by an eager crowd upon arrival in Duluth. They were in town for a free street parade and one day of performances on June 14, 1920. Accusations On the warm summer night of June 14, Irene Tusken, age nineteen, and James Sullivan, eighteen, went to the circus in Duluth. At the end of the evening the pair walked to the rear of the main tent. Nobody is sure of what happened next, but in the early morning of June 15th, Duluth Police Chief John Murphy received a call from James Sullivan’s father saying six black circus workers had held the pair at gunpoint and then raped Irene Tusken. Little evidence would be found to corroborate these claims. An examination of Tusken that morning by Dr. David Graham, a family physician, showed no physical signs of rape or assault. http://www.withoutsanctuary.org/pics_24.html
.
Mr. Elias Clayton, Mr. Elmer Jackson, and Mr. Isaac McGhie ( Three Black Men)– are taken from jail by a mob and lynched, on the word of James Sullivan’s father, (a white man). An examination of Tusken that morning by Dr. David Graham, a family physician, showed no physical signs of rape or assault. We find the evidence to be overwhelming that this is another case of "Wrongful Conviction, Cold-Blooded Murder and of a Judicial Lynching"
.
*************************************************************************
.
Supreme Court Justice, Hugo Black was Klan, his robes (with his name in them) were found in an old Klan Hall in the 1960's. Under political pressure, he superficially repudiated the Klan during its period of scandals http://www.kkklan.com/wall.htm
Hugo LaFayette Black (February 27, 1886 – September 25, 1971) was a Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States (1937 - 1971)… In the 1920's, Black (like Chief Justice Edward Douglass White) was a member of the Ku Klux Klan, and in 1921 he defended Klansmen accused of the murder of priest James Coyle. However, he later publicly disavowed the Klan, and his record on the Supreme Court bench contained some indications of support for the Civil Rights Movement. http://www.spiritus-temporis.com/hugo-black/
.
The pastor was sitting on the rectory porch in his swing chair. Stevenson walked up to the priest and pulled the trigger. Father James Edwin Coyle was shot in the head; he died within the hour. http://catholicism.org/victim-of-the-klan-father-james-edwin-coyle-alabama.html On August 11 of 1921, Black was asked to defend the Reverend Edwin R. Stephenson http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._R._Stephenson a Ku Klux Klan member who had been accused of shooting to death Father James Coyle , leader of the large Catholic community at Saint Paul's Church in Birmingham. The presiding judge and several members of the courtroom staff were active Klan members and they helped to ensure that several members of the KKK were selected to jury service. According to page 87 of the biography by Roger K. Newman, no official records of this trial exist and their destruction is attributed to the power and influence of members of the Ku Klux Klan at that time. Accounts of some of the trial's events have nevertheless circulated. Black is reported to have communicated with the Klansmen on the jury through the organization's hand signals in order to secure a verdict of not guilty for his client. http://academickids.com/encyclopedia/index.php/Hugo_Black
.
.
![Edward Douglass White [Credits : Courtesy of the National Archives, Washington, D.C.]](http://media-2.web.britannica.com//eb-media/94/42494-003-D1C60CAE.gif "Edward Douglass White [Credits : Courtesy of the National Archives, Washington, D.C.]")
Chief Justice Edward Douglass White was a member of the Ku Klux Klan. White was a Supreme Court Justice under the Wilson administration, he was a member of the original KKK. In 1896 he sided with the seven justices whose majority opinion in Plessy v. Ferguson approved segregation. http://www.kkklan.com/wall.htm
Justice John Marshall Harlan, a former slave owner who experienced a conversion as a result of Ku Klux Klan excesses, and champion of black civil rights, wrote a scathing dissent in which he predicted the court's decision would become as infamous as that in Dred Scott v. Sandford. Harlan went on to say: http://www.powerset.com/explore/semhtml/Plessy_v._Ferguson .
_500x374.jpg)
http://georgehigh.com/Supreme%20Court/S.C.%20Bill%20Morrison%20%20Jan..%2022%2C%20%202001.pdf Petition for Writ of Certiorari On The Highs Civil Rights Action against Bill Morrison and Michael Abbott, Jan. 22, 2001
http://georgehigh.com/Supreme%20Court/S.C.%20Bill%2000-9506%20denied%20%206-25-01.pdf Supreme Court Denied the Highs Petition June 25, 2001
http://georgehigh.com/Supreme%20Court/George%20%26%20Virginia%20%20%20%20March%2025%2C%202002.pdf Petition for Writ of Certiorari- 11th Circuit Court of Appeals March 25, 2002
http://georgehigh.com/Supreme%20Court/S.C.%20Denied%2001-9251%20%20April%2022%2C%202002.pdf Supreme Court Dernied the Highs Petition April 22, 2002
http://georgehigh.com/Supreme%20Court/supreme%20court%20cetiorari%20%203-21-05.pdf Petition for Writ of Certiorari - 11th Circuit Court of Appeals Lacked Jurisdiction Jan.. 18, 2005
http://georgehigh.com/Supreme%20Court/Order%20Feb.%2028%2C%202005.pdf Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis Denied, but Petitioner was allowed until March 21, 2005 to pay docking fee and re-submit petition February 28, 2005
http://georgehigh.com/Supreme%20Court/S.C.%20Cased%20Closed%2004-8325%20%203-25-05.pdf March 25, 2005 Just when "we" learn how to play the game, "y'all" change the rules. Oh! they now say that we were allowed 21 days until March 15, 2005, so the case is considered closed. But in fact according to the above letter dated February 28, 2005, we were allowed until March 21, 2005. No big deal cause "we" always get "Fucked".
proof of timely mailing determine whether the Motion is late, and the date of mailing was 03-18/2005 http://georgehigh.com/Supreme%20Court/S.C.%2004-8325%20%20date%20bad.pdf
.
[see] Platsky v. C.I.A. 953 F.. 2d 26 (2nd cir. 1991) Pro Se Plaintiffs are often unfamiliar with the formalities of pleading requirements. Recognizing this, the Supreme Court has instructed the District Court to construe Pro Se complaints liberally and to apply a more flexible standard in determining the sufficiency of a Pro Se complaint, than they would in reviewing a pleading submitted by counsel. see e.g. Hughes v. Rove 449 U.S. 5, 9-10, 101 S. Ct. 173, 175-76, 66 L.Ed 2d 163 (1980) (per curiam): Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21, 92 S. Ct. 594, 595-96, 30 L. Ed .2d 652 (1972) (per curiam) , see also Elliott v. Brunsom, 87 F. 2d 20, 21 (2d cir. 1989) ( per curiam) In order to justify the dismissal of a Pro Se complaint it must be "beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entile him to relief ".
Haines v. Kerner 504 U.S. at 521, 92 S.ct at 594 (quoting Con1ey v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41. 45-46, 78 S.Ct.99, 102, 2 L.Bd.2d 80 (1957). [1,2) In light of these principles, we think that the district court should not have dismissed Platsky's complaint without affording him leave to replead.
The kkk (men & women) 1928 March in DC, with the Stares & Stripes, to celebrate the Supreme Court's ruling in favor of the eugenicists in Buck vs. Bell.. to keep them "undesirables" in their place and to keep the "white race" pure.. http://www.pointsouth.com/csanet/kkk.htm
"We hold these truths to be self-evident that all men are created equal" ... 1776
...."The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour"...1787
.
Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, a former slave owner, declared that all blacks -- slaves as well as free -- were not and could never become citizens of the United States - March 1857
U. S. Supreme Court in Plesser v. Furguson. ruled that "separate but equal" was the law - 1896
Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes speaking for the Court, wrote, "three generations of imbeciles are enough" - 1927
On December 10, 1967, Virginia High became one of the 3,300 Georgians who were legally forced to undergo sterilization surgery, ...thanks to the U.S. Supreme ct., Justice Holmes, Adolf Hitler, the State of Georgia, American eugenics and the kkk...
Chief Justice Edward Douglass White, Justice Van Devanter and Hugo L. Black was all "Card-Carrying-Ku Klux Klan".
Chief Justice Roger B. Taney and Justice John Marshall Harlan, former slave owner's
U.S. Supreme Court....in fact according to the above letter dated February 28, 2005, we were allowed until March 21, 2005. No big deal cause "we" always get Fucked.
(CNSNews.com) January 10, 2006-- Supreme Court nominee Judge Samuel Alito Monday told the Senate Judiciary Committee that no one in the U.S. is above or beneath the law. He also said he believes a judge's only obligation is to uphold the rule of law. http://www.gopusa.com/news/2006/january/0110_alito_comments.shtml
.
****************************************************************************************
.
The record will clearly reflect, and I have proven beyond a reasonable doubt, that from at least 1992, until this very day, the Executive and Judicial branches of the United States of America and their surrogates has engaged in a "continued and on-going" pattern of Racketeering and has colluded amongst themselves to maintain a united front and stonewall all the efforts of George and Virginia High in their quest for Equal Protection and Due Process of Law... The Highs have also been the victims of a government frame-up and racist conspiracy, the objective of which was to frame and imprison George and Virginia High because they would not "cut-a-deal"...
Under the circumstances, criminal and/or civil racketeering charges, or both, are legally justifiable and well within the statute of limitations against the named persons/entities who all had a part, directly or indirectly, in the "Racist Conspiracy, Framing and Wrongful Conviction" of George and Virginia High via the Investigation, the Indictment, the Trial, the Sentence, Incarceration and/or the Cover-up...
.THE CHARGES AGAINST THEM
Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241
Conspiracy Against Rights
This statute makes it unlawful for two or more persons to conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person of any state, territory or district in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him/her by the Constitution or the laws of the United States, (or because of his/her having exercised the same).
Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242
Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law
This statute makes it a crime for any person acting under color of law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom to willfully deprive or cause to be deprived from any person those rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution and laws of the U.S.
U.S. law enforcement officers and other officials like judges, prosecutors, and security guards have been given tremendous power by local, state, and federal government agencies-authority they must have to enforce the law and ensure justice in our country. These powers include the authority to detain and arrest suspects, to search and seize property, to bring criminal charges, to make rulings in court, and to use deadly force in certain situations. Preventing abuse of this authority, however, is equally necessary to the health of our nation's democracy. That's why it's a federal crime for anyone acting under "color of law" willfully to deprive or conspire to deprive a person of a right protected by the Constitution or U.S. law. "Color of law" simply means that the person is using authority given to him or her by a local, state, or federal government agency. http://www.fbi.gov/hq/cid/civilrights/statutes.htm
Joe D. Whitley, Former U.S. Attorney
H. Allen Moye, Prosecutor
Barbara Brown, FBI,
West Johnson, U.S. Marshall
Lewis Valez, BATF
Dennis Tudor, U. S. Probation Dept.
William Salinski, IRS
Shelia Whipple, IRS
Terry Sosebee, GBICharles Boyd, GBI
William Morrison, Attorney for George High
Michael Abbott, Attorney for Virginia High
12 Judges from the 11th Cir. Ct. of Appeals
.
Racketeering and RICO: RICO stands for the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (18 U.S.C. § 1961), a law that increases the severity of penalties for crimes performed in conjunction with organized crime. The law states that any person or group who commits any two out of a list of 35 crimes (known as racketeering activity in the U.S. Code) within a decade and can be determined to have committed them with similar results or similar intentions can be charged with racketeering. The maximum penalties for racketeering include a fine of up to $25,000 and up to 20 years in prison in addition to the forfeiture of all business interests and gains gleaned from the criminal activity. In addition, the case can be re-tried in civil court; plaintiffs are allowed to sue for triple damages. The law covers crimes such as bribery, extortion, money laundering, counterfeiting, gambling, murder, arson, robbery, kidnapping, harboring certain illegal aliens, obstruction of justice, slavery and others.George W. High, Sr.
“Equal Justice Under Law” is chiseled in Stone on the front of the U.S. Supreme Court building. All men are created equal is one of the most important doctrines that our founders espoused. It means that no one is above the law. Kings are not above the law, groups are not above the law, no individual is above the law but there is “equal justice under law.” http://agentgenius.com/g-rants-insanity-more/equal-justice-under-law/
Alexander Hamilton Stephens, (1812 - 1883) Ga. vice president of the Confederacy: "With us, all of the white race, however high or low, rich or poor, are equal in the eye of the law. Not so with the negro. Subordination is his place. He, by nature, or by the curse against Canaan, is fitted for that condition which he occupies in our system. It is, indeed, in conformity with the ordinance of the Creator. It is not for us to inquire into the wisdom of His ordinances, or to question them. For His own purposes, He has made one race to differ from another, as He has made one star to differ from another star in glory. The great objects of humanity are best attained when there is conformity to His laws and decrees, in the formation of governments as well as in all things else." http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/index.asp?documentprint=76
.
"We Shall Overcome" - Martin Luther King, Jr. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=130J-FdZDtY&feature=related
.
OBAMA - Lift Ev'ry Voice http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zWtxCW9stNk&feature=fvw
.